Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Shintaro
From: Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 08:59:51 -0700 (PDT)

Now that's a pretty stupid thing to say.
Am I supposed to trust him because people who feel the
need to have their cameras repainted like him.
Do I know this guy! I don't assume anything about him
except for what I've observed on his site and from
user's commenmts. Considering the reaction of some of
those users to my doubts I must discounts their
comments about the quality of the paint job.


I am questioning the quality of a product seen on the
web. I don't give a dam who makes it nor do I care if
you happen to like him. If you can't handle that too
bad. but don't resort to conducting personal attacks
against me. 

In the olden day this thread would have led to a
discussion about different types of paint. prepaint
metal treatment processes, different kinds of baking
scenarios, difficult applications such paint retention
on a knurled lands and all sorts of interesting stuff.
But now thanks to a few people 
discourse is stifled and it all turns into crap.


This all goes to a larger issue. I've been on this
list for years and it has become impossible to hold
serious discussions on products and services because a
small group turns to mud slinging. It's happened to me
and to several other people before. Normally I'de be
willing to stop responding in the name of peace and
traquility but it's gone too far. I will keep this up
until something gives. 

Javier

- --- Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> wrote:
> Shintaro's web page says he strips off the chrome.
> Many on this list have
> confirmed he strips off the chrome.
> 
> You insist the photos show otherwise.
> 
> I think in the eyes of just about everyone you have
> questioned Shintaro's
> trustworthiness.
> 
> In my eyes your continual hounding of this issue on
> this list is taking on
> the appearance of a smear campaign.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> Javier Perez wrote:
> 
> > What accusations!
> > These are fair observations nothing more.
> > Have I questioned the trustworthiness of anyone?
> > Maybe it's you who should lighten up.
> > Javier
> >
> >  Many trust worthy people have had
> > > cameras done by him
> > > and can attest that the chrome has been removed.
> It
> > > is very obvious with
> > > the slightest nick. You are basing your
> accusations
> > > on a downloaded jpeg.
> > >
> > > Lighten up,
> > >
> > > John Collier
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 01:56 AM, Javier
> Perez
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From your comments it looks like you haven't
> read
> > > my
> > > > post. I linked to his sample html showing a
> chrome
> > > top
> > > > painted black, not a brass top painted black.
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see
> >
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
> > http://health.yahoo.com
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] Shintaro)