Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: B&W vs Colour (was "National Geographic")
From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:31:45 +0100
References: <9A205CEA32FED411B6670002A513ABCE0EF8FA5E@exlon01.lehman.com>

From: "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: 22 April 2002 10:57
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: B&W vs Colour (was "National Geographic")


> There's a clinical psychology thesis in here somewhere.  B&W vs colour,
> Leica vs Nikon, Mac vs PC, Kodak vs Fuji, Ford vs GM, Windows vs Linux.
> Every, newsgroup, mailing list and local pub has an argument of this sort
> simmering away: must be some deep rooted evolutionary need to belong to a
> tribe or something.
>
> Anyway...
>
> Your film, camera, computer, car is crap.  Mine rocks!
>
> <IRONICALLY CHALLENGED DISCLAIMER>
> Please note this is not intended as an attack on anyone.  Merely an
> observation.
> </IRONICALLY CHALLENGED DISCLAIMER>
================================================================
Sir,
        I have never been so insulted in my life. I am not in need of a
clinical psychologist nor am I satisfying some deep rooted evolutionary
need. Why you should embark on this vitriolic, personal attack on me because
I prefer B&W to colour is totally beyond my understan.....er sorry, I
withdraw it all, just spotted the disclaimer.

Graham
http://geebeephoto.com




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com> (RE: [Leica] Re: B&W vs Colour (was "National Geographic"))