Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: RE:[Leica] National Geographic
From: "Felix Lopez de Maturana" <fmaturana@euskalnet.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 00:18:43 +0200

<Felix mon ami,

<The idea is:

<"When you photograph people in colour, you photograph their clothes!

<But when you photograph them in B&W you photograph their souls!"

<As in meaning the B&W is more revealing as it shows the innerself. One need
<only look at the portraits by Yousuf Karsh!

<I don't want to get into a big thing on this, but is it not a kind of
<accepted notion that B&W is a more powerful medium when photographing
people
<than colour? Partially because the viewer can use their imagination to add
<colour if they wish or accept the B&W photograph as all revealing.
<ted

<Ted Grant Photography Limited
<www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant

Ted,  amigo mio

Just your opinion I strongly and warmly respect.  I do truly believe that
many,many,many of us do shoot b&w pictures of anybody in anywhere, anytime
and believe we've got great pictures. It's firing "à la Bresson" or "à la
Sieff". It seems that anything in b&w it's a outstanding picture if,
besides, has been taken with a Leica. No, let me say clearly,  NO. There are
many pictures, even in the LUG, in b&w that are banal, trivial, vulgar, that
show people in their ordinary life without any interest but never the
decisive moment or anything like that if it does exist. We are specialized
in saying other member  "your picture is great!". I rarely said that,  and
never about my own pictures. And so often  many pictures lacked merely
color. I remember a LUG member who showed a flower macro picture in b&w!
It's very difficult to manage properly color. I admire, for instance, the
Ernst Haas work for the way he managed color. Bresson, Sief, and all of them
are today out. There is plenty of space for investigating new ways. Just
have a look to the non photojournalist contests those where pure art is
involved and you'll see new and creative ways. Just have a look to the young
photographers. They are very, very creative. Very often we cannot understand
their work but always it's interesting. LUG curse me but, please, awake up!
PJ are other field as they have to get reality in a dramatic way, Their
pictures have to show exactly what is happening.

I dared to replay this to you Ted, one of the most rspectable member of the
list, quite the contrary am I, because, as you, I am not young, just 50
years taking pictures,  so that I do not believe in topics.

Truly warms regards

Felix

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html