Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I disagree. The picture is not about "tits". Sure that's the centerpiece of interest, but aside from that, clearly its very well done. Perhaps through digital editing, in creating the backlight-softness, but also in controlling the contrast to show all the shadow details. That's what I meant by "technically awesome". Frankly I couldn't have produced such an image, both erotically or technically. - --- Teresa299@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 4/19/02 12:37:09 PM, > bdcolen@earthlink.net writes: > > << It's a fascinating image, but what is "awsome" > about it "technically?" > Obviously Kyle knows how to handle backlighting, but > why is it technically > awsome. What am I missing? It could have been taken > with any reasonably good > camera and lens. > > B. D. >> > > > Why is it technically awesome? > > Tits B.D. Tits! They're technical marvels of > nature! > > Now open yer pocketbook and buy the print. We all > know you're aching to get > one. ; ) > > > -kim > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html