Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I believe it was 1600, which I usually rate at 800. The negs are at the studio, and as I've been flipping back and forth between the 400, rated at 200, and the 1600 I can't recall. The "are your paper in order" mind set was still in its infancy then, particularly in the rural areas. But I have a feeling that recruiters were turning a blind eye to the age factor. I had a friend years ago who told me he was sent in by his adoptive family at 15. They lied about his age, as they could no longer countenance and handle him. He was one of those native-american babies that white folks had a yen for back then, when they couldn't have one of their own. He hadn't yet reached 18 when the war was over. On the other hand, it beggars the question on how much of that early enlistment in the CA southland was driven by the aftermath of the Zoot Suit Riots. Slobodan Dimitrov Christopher Williams wrote: > > Neopan 1600? Great film if that's what you used. > > Makes me think if any 16 year olds today would be able to get into the > military if another world war broke out. I met a WWII vet last year who went > into the Army in 1942 at the age of 14. > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html