Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] [OT} what type of print is most archival? (was: [OT] Digital Dark...
From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 07:26:18 -0700
References: <134.ceb4ef6.29f01f52@aol.com>

seriously, there is a lot of carbon in the human body ;-)

carbon is carbon, it's all a matter of how it's arranged, molecularly speaking.
diamonds are carbon too.

SthRosner@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 4/18/02 12:45:33 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> kottjn@hotmail.com writes:
>
> > Do you seriously expect the carbon inks to last as long as platinum?
>
> Isn't this the same carbon ( C ) used in "carbon-dating" of fossils thousands
> of years old? C'mon, pure carbon is one of the basic building blocks of the
> universe, and everywhere else.
>
> Seriously.
>
> Seth         LaK 9
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] [OT} what type of print is most archival? (was: [OT] Digital Dark...)