Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity
From: "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 21:45:44 -0500
References: <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA258183D1B@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu> <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA258183D1B@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu> <5.1.0.14.2.20020416161948.009e9050@mail.msy.bellsouth.net>

> Non-gratuitous nudity is rarely very easy on the eyes.
>
> JLS

There's such a thing as gratuitous nudity?

> At 02:20 PM 4/16/02, you wrote:
> >Kyle:
> >
> > >http://www.netaxs.com/~cassidy/col.html
> >
> >Good use of colors.  Nice effect.  Seems like gratuitous nudity.  Not
that
> >there's anything wrong with that, though.  :)
> >
> >I think I'd like it better without the street and car in the background.
At
> >the end of an alley where there's just a brick wall back behind.  I like
the
> >green color on the ground.
> >
> >
> >Eric
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Message from Jeffery Smith <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)