Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Cron vs Lux
From: Ken Wilcox <klw.51@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 21:51:41 -0400
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOEEHPDFAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net> <005201c1e26e$7f15ce60$30a03bcb@pavilion>

Karina,

I have both lux and cron 35 asph lenses. I don't think that you will 
see a differrence in performance. So why do I have both? The cron is 
in LTM and the lux is M.

Ken Wilcox


At 8:07 AM +1000 4/13/02, Karina Klaas wrote:
>Thanks BD, - I already have one fast lens so I would propably lean towards
>the Cron.  My question, which was not clear at all, was more about the
>variance in quality between Lux and Cron. (glass quality etc).
>
>Karina
>

- -- 
_____________________
Ken Wilcox
klw.51 at comcast.net
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: The Word of the Lord)
Message from "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au> (Re: [Leica] Re: Cron vs Lux)