Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Different SCA for R and M?
From: "Frank W." <wwk001@netvigator.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:11:00 +0800
References: <B8D63B78.1CF18%joseph@yao.com>

I wonder what happens if I use SCA3502 on R6.2.....burnt out? short circuit?

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Yao" <joseph@yao.com>
To: "Leica User Group" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Different SCA for R and M?


> on 7/4/02 5:55 pm, Frank W. at wwk001@netvigator.com wrote:
>
> > Just got my Metz 54MZ-3 recently. From Metz's web the appropriate SCA
should
> > be:
> >
> > R6.2, R7 - SCA 351
> > R8, M6-TTL - SCA 3502
> >
> > Does it mean that I've to buy 2 SCAs, one for my R6.2 and another for my
R8?
> >
> > Pls advise.
>
> I have also just bought a few 54MZ3s.  The answer to your question is,
yes,
> you have to buy a specific SCA module for a specific camera system.  In
your
> case, SCA 351 for R6.2 and R7, and SCA 3502 for R8 and M6 TTL.  If you
also
> use Canon EOS and Nikon, the appropriate SCA modules are SCA 3102 and SCA
> 3402 respectively.
>
> HTH.
>
> Bests,
>
> Joseph Yao
> Hong Kong
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Joseph Yao <joseph@yao.com> (Re: [Leica] Different SCA for R and M?)