Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:16:14 -0500

ROFLOL! I think.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Steve
LeHuray
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:13 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8


> I must confess I have a very poor understanding for this 'value' thingy.
I
> am more interested in quality.  I am just very heartened Leica are now
> offering this lens again, the price is really not a concern.
>
> Dr. J

GREAT!! Dr J, that is exactly how I feel whenever I order a new yacht, "if
you have to ask how much...". If only we did not have to be plagued by the
unwashed like B.D.

sl

>
> on 3/4/02 4:17 am, B. D. Colen at bdcolen@earthlink.net wrote:
>
>> But then, given that this lens is certainly not 10+ times better than
it's
>> Nikon and Canon competitors - in fact, given that it is unlikely that it
is
>> even twice as good - it better at least take 10 times as long to
>> manufacturer to give Leica a justification for charging more than 10
times
>> what the competition charges for its 35-70 2.8 lenses. ;-)
>>
>> B. D.
>
> --
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html