Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]ROFLOL! I think. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Steve LeHuray Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 3:13 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] leica 35-70 /2.8 > I must confess I have a very poor understanding for this 'value' thingy. I > am more interested in quality. I am just very heartened Leica are now > offering this lens again, the price is really not a concern. > > Dr. J GREAT!! Dr J, that is exactly how I feel whenever I order a new yacht, "if you have to ask how much...". If only we did not have to be plagued by the unwashed like B.D. sl > > on 3/4/02 4:17 am, B. D. Colen at bdcolen@earthlink.net wrote: > >> But then, given that this lens is certainly not 10+ times better than it's >> Nikon and Canon competitors - in fact, given that it is unlikely that it is >> even twice as good - it better at least take 10 times as long to >> manufacturer to give Leica a justification for charging more than 10 times >> what the competition charges for its 35-70 2.8 lenses. ;-) >> >> B. D. > > -- - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html