Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B. D. Wrote: >>> And, of course, the concept that a free roll of film and processing is any > kind of compensation for the loss of ones images - be they personal shots of > the kids on Xmas morning or the champion tomatoes, or shots taken on a > paying job - is utterly ridiculous.<<<<<< And B.D. they've got away with that for years! They cover their butt with replacing the roll no matter who's fault by stating whatever the waver is when you purchase the film. In Montreal during the 76 Olympics I had 20 rolls destroyed of the Canada-USSR basketball game, a very significant one to decide who was playing in one of the medal rounds. Another photographer, a European freelancer on contract to cover the USSR team had all his rolls destroyed from the same game. He lost thousands of dollars due to the wipe out and all Kodak did was blame someone else and hand him a package of film replacing what was lost. The guy was so devastated he sat in a corner of the lab holding his head and crying like a child. What some of the people here praising Kodak for their KR processing and perfection of every roll coming back peachy keen is wonderful for them. When so many of us have had film destroyed or mucked up beyond belief for a company of Kodak's stature. Besides that, folks here have absolutely no idea the mental trauma and amount of monetary loss a professional photographer can suffer when all his/her efforts and irreplaceable film has been wiped out. It's quite devastating really, particularly on a high profile assignment. And when your sitting with nothing more to show for your work, but rolls of new film in your lap, trust me, it isn't the least bit consoling one iota. :-( ted Ted Grant Photography Limited www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html