Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The only thing I can think of as to why that might be is that I use the Fair Lawn, NJ lab. It's been there for 30 years, at least, and they do a lot of pro work from NYC. The mailers I have have Fair Lawn's address pre-printed. I believe some require you to put in the address. If so, I'd put in the Fair Lawn address. In 20 years, they have never destroyed any of my film. Allan On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 04:05 PM, Ken Wilcox wrote: > I'm envious of your proximity. I shot a couple of rolls last summer, > using it for the first time in several years. Kodalux sent the first > back 2 and half months later with dirt stuck all over it. They lost the > second one. > > Ken Wilcox > > > At 03:25 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote: >> For me, I drive down to the Kodak processing plant, drop the film off, >> and pick it up the next day. Never had a roll badly developed. For >> others, It's a matter of buying a Kodak mailer and sending it out. >> I've heard people say they received terrible processing from Kodak. I >> don't know how to answer them; I've never, never had even one slide >> poorly processed. >> >> Allan >> >> >> On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 11:49 AM, rclompus@cox.net wrote: >>> >>> How difficult is it to get a roll of Kodachome 64 developed? >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > ------------------------ > Ken Wilcox > klw.51(at)comcast.net > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html