Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's simple - Not everyone on this Leica list thinks that because Leica makes it, it's automatically the best. Some of us actually think that Leica's reflex bodies are sadly out of date and overpriced. And some of us also believe that, in the reflex world, there are numerous lenses that are - at least under real-world conditions, the equal of Leica lenses. Liking, using, appreciating, one part of the Leica line doesn't require one to use, like, admire the entire line. BTW, $7000 for a 35-70 2.8 zoom?!!!! That is truly sad. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of BOB KRAMER Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:32 AM To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us' Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Eric's PAW week 13 Can't imagine why someone on a leica list would say that. There are a couple of pretty marvelous macro lenses in the R lineup, you know. BK > -----Original Message----- > From: Allan Wafkowski [mailto:allan@sohogurus.net] > Subject: [Leica] Re: Eric's PAW week 13 > > Who was it that said the best Leica for close-up work is a > Nikon? Was it > someone here? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html