Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] What does the 75 Summilux really look like?
From: Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 12:32:05 -0500
References: <310B62141943D111845E00600808E14E024005B8@EXCHANGE>

BK,

No, I think I understand B.D., I just thought I might reply to his
posting:)  I have learned to take this list VERY lightly:)

Sam

BOB KRAMER wrote:
> 
> Sam, you will kind of, sort of, almost, get used to B.D. after a while.
> Think of a court jester with really lousy job satisfaction!  ;-)
> 
> BK
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sam Carleton [mailto:scarleton@miltonstreet.com]
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] What does the 75 Summilux really look like?
> >
> > BD,
> >
> > You make it sound like I am up nights worring about what the 75 looks
> > like on a camera and cannot make up my mind on whether or not
> > I want one
> > until I see what it looks like on a M.  I am not, before I
> > ever made the
> > posting, I had desided that the 75 was/is the right lens for
> > me.  I was
> > simply WONDERING what it might look like.
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> (RE: [Leica] What does the 75 Summilux really look like?)