Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Pascal, Thanks for your response. Probabaly I need to further clarify my question: 1. I used a 90/2.8 (E55 version) before. I chosed it over the 90/2 because I don't like the softness and tone of the 90/2. 2. I switched to 100/2.8APO basically because I wanted a ROM lens which 90/2.8 could not offer. 3. I began to find that the 100/2.8APO is often too crispy and contrasty for portraits, even when fully opened. That's why I'm considering for another move. Probably I could have 3 choices at this moment: 1. Always use my Contax Softar I on the 100/2.8APO for portraits. Or always use low contrast films like Kodak ProImage. 2. Switch to the 80/1.4, which I'm not sure that is a good move or not as it might be too soft for me. 3. Wait for 90/2.0APO and hope that will be a better lens for portraits in terms of tone and contrast. I'm looking for comment on these. Did I make myself clear? Thks/Rgds. Frank W. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pascal" <cyberdog@attglobal.net> To: "LUG" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:06 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Looking for Comments on 80/1.4R > On 21-03-2002 18:45 Frank W. wrote: > > > Another choice is to wait for the 90/2.0APO-R. But don't when it will be > > available. > > But I thought you said that the 100/2.8 APO was too crispy for portraits. > How would the 90/2.0 APO change that ? > > Pascal > NO ARCHIVE > -- > --------- > Visit my Leica photo pages at http://www.leicapages.com > --------- > <<< PGP public key available upon request >>> > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html