Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Tim, > > Yes, I have seen this statement here on the LUG as well as > elsewhere. I think > the idea is that negative film has a lower inherent dynamic range, thus > placing fewer demands on the scanner (compared with transparency film). > > Nathan Hi Nathan, Your statement is correct, except replace "dynamic range" with "density range". The two are different, though people interchange them unknowingly. Regards, Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html