Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 135/3.4 APO Telyt vs 135/2.8 Elmarit
From: Marc Attinasi <marc@attinasi.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 22:38:27 -0800
References: <18a.4d74197.29c2b275@aol.com>

SthRosner@aol.com wrote:

>B.D. said that if you like the 135mm focal 
>length, it works much better with a reflex. I agree as do many others. I 
>believe that most Leica photographers who use both RF and SLR will have the 
>135 for reflex use. 
>
Not me. Personally, I like the 135 on my M more than on my SLR's, R or 
otherwise. In fact, I sold my 135 SLR lenses because I very rarely used 
them. When I need that range and I want to use an SLR I use an 80-200 
zoom - and I generally end up more nearer to 180 or 200. On my M6 0.85 
the 135 lines are not too bad - smaller than the others, yes, but quite 
usable.  But then my eyes are still very good, and I really like seeing 
what is around the frame lines - something the SLR cannot do.  Now I 
just wish I could afford the 135 APO! I'll probably try that magnifier 
attachment thingy someday too.


- - marc

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "SML" <inyoung@jps.net> (Re: [Leica] 135/3.4 APO Telyt vs 135/2.8 Elmarit)
In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] 135/3.4 APO Telyt vs 135/2.8 Elmarit)