Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art)
From: Photo Phreak <leicam4pro@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:00:47 -0800 (PST)

- --- Don Dory <dorysrus@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Jumping in the middle of the fray:  this was exactly my
> point on my PAW.
> Folks in the middle of great art were standing around
> staring at their
> watch, looking off into space.
> 
> Why should the US government support art when people pay
> to see truly
> wonderful surrealist work and then don't see it.  It was
> more stamping the
> been there, done that card than drinking in the world
> that fine art can show
> us.
============================================================

Surrealism does not appeal to all.  I think most of it to
be a practical joke on the viewer.  I went to a showing at
the Art Institute of Chicago.  They were showing a film of
Veruscha standing naked before an object and being
bodypainted to match the backround, thereby being
camoflaged and unnoticable.  ART ??  More like practical
joke that someone would actually pay to see such a
thing....

But if the same things appealed to all,  what a dull,
boring world it would be.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html