Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:43 AM 3/12/02 -0700, John Collier wrote: > >The facts are simple. You cannot write an impartial review if you are >subject to an ongoing NDA. Reviews should be released after a NDA has >expired not written to conform to one. The email suggests that MAYBE Erwin >was subject to a NDA that prevented him from discussing a problem with the >M7. If you are subject to a NDA, you should keep quiet until you are free >from it; and, you should not claim to be able to criticise impartially when >in fact you cannot. You say that he was completely free as of the M7 release >date but the email he posted here SEEMS to imply otherwise. John RE-READ the posting. Erwin clearly states that he could not discuss the matter UNTIL NOW. He honored the Non-Disclosure Agreement during its life. He states that he is now discussing it, ALTHOUGH he could not do so prior to now. Again, where's the beef, brother? Heavens, but you do have a suspicious mind! Marc msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +276/343-7315 Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir! - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html