Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art)
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:03:31 -0500
References: <310B62141943D111845E00600808E14E0240057F@EXCHANGE>

At 03:34 PM 3/11/02 -0500, you wrote:
>I think "inhibiting" is a bit harsh, but I think that the point Tina is
>making is one that has been made here before - albiet quite a while ago -
>and that is that when folks who don't depend upon their
>photography/painting/sculpture/writing/computer programing to make a living
>price it well below the market when compared to those who do those things to
>make a living, it makes earning a living pretty difficult for the
>full-timers: particularly when the seller is someone like Kyle, whose
>photographic work is better than that of a goodly percentage of the
>full-time "pros" out there.
>
>B. D.

Thanks, B.D.  That's it exactly.

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
images available from http://www.pdiphotos.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art))
In reply to: Message from BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> (RE: [Leica] price of art prints (was re: kyle's fine art))