Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 3/11/02 2:36:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, henryting10@yahoo.com writes: > About "need to know" basis and "NDA". > I think if Leica is to enforce the NDA, then Leica > itself is equally at fault. Any industrial > confidential information should NOT be disclosed in > the first case. Of course Henry is correct here. > Our arguments here is whether Erwin is liable. I doubt > if Leica is too upset. He might be an insider,...... Any question of "liability" is between Erwin and Leica. From our point of view, that of the interested Leica photographer, the issue is not one of liability but of credibility, i.e. of Erwin's independence and objectivity. Assuming we are not all the dupes of another fake posting, the disclosure suggests that his evaluations must be read with a certain healthy skepticism. Seth LaK 9 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html