Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] airport response
From: "John R. Fulton Jr." <JRFjr@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:24:04 -0600
References: <200203101847.g2AIliC09997@panix3.panix.com> <001f01c1c873$284b43e0$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net>

Here's what Kodak says on their motion picture side, but I'm not sure 
it's real helpful.

http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/technical/xray4.shtml

It's also dated in November.
best,
John



>
>Rei,
>  write to Kodak, Ilford and Fuji for their stats on this subject. I'm sure
>you'll be surprised at the information and testing they've done over the
>years.
>
>Even the FAA may have information they'd pass along. Also find out who the
>manufacturer is of the scanners and contact them.
>
>Me? I just throw the film on as it usually is used long before ten or so
>passes through the scanner. Although I've had film go through more than a
>half dozen look at's before reaching final shoot destination. And
>surprise.... not a fog element of any kind even film shot at 800 and about
>40 rolls of 1600. :-)
>
>Lots of fact finding info out there if you are still concerned.
>ted
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Rei Shinozuka" <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] airport response)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] airport response)