Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 09:10:28 +1100
References: <310B62141943D111845E00600808E14E02400569@EXCHANGE>

I this a LUG indentity crisis?  :-P


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "BOB KRAMER" <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 3:17 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless


> I agree.  I could understand the desire for anonymity on some local chat
> room or the free for all at rec.photo, but the lug is much more of a
> community.  Many mailing lists like this will require that real names be
> used.  If I was Brain, I would require real names.  The price of admission
> in my mind.
>
> BK
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Collier [mailto:jbcollier@powersurfr.com]
> > Subject: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
> >
> >
> > It was bad enough going through the desert on a horse with no
> > name. I am not
> > going to have conversations with someone called Photo Phreak!
> >
> > Seriously though, we all use our real names here and I
> > appreciate it. We are
> > not fourteen year olds taking a break from cruising porn
> > sites. It is not
> > all about cameras; people, personalities and names are important.
> >
> > John Collier
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com> (RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)