RE: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless

[BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>]

I agree.  I could understand the desire for anonymity on some local chat
room or the free for all at rec.photo, but the lug is much more of a
community.  Many mailing lists like this will require that real names be
used.  If I was Brain, I would require real names.  The price of admission
in my mind.

BK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Collier [mailto:jbcollier@powersurfr.com]
> Subject: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
> 
> 
> It was bad enough going through the desert on a horse with no 
> name. I am not
> going to have conversations with someone called Photo Phreak!
> 
> Seriously though, we all use our real names here and I 
> appreciate it. We are
> not fourteen year olds taking a break from cruising porn 
> sites. It is not
> all about cameras; people, personalities and names are important.
> 
> John Collier
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html