Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "Karina Klaas" <shutterbug@iinet.net.au>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 08:56:11 +1100
References: <B8AE25B7.1ADFA%jbcollier@powersurfr.com>

Photophreak is propably Robert De Niro - didn't someone ask if he is a Leica
fan....mmmmm.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@powersurfr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 2:24 AM
Subject: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless


> It was bad enough going through the desert on a horse with no name. I am
not
> going to have conversations with someone called Photo Phreak!
>
> Seriously though, we all use our real names here and I appreciate it. We
are
> not fourteen year olds taking a break from cruising porn sites. It is not
> all about cameras; people, personalities and names are important.
>
> John Collier
>
> > From: SthRosner@aol.com
> >
> > please let the phreakperson be. I've had an off-list communication with
> > her/him and there is very sound reason for the lack of ID. Honest.
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@powersurfr.com> ([Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)