Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From: "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: 08 March 2002 21:17 Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless > photophreak posteth thus: > > > > Judge me by the content of what I post, not by your own > > imaginations. > > > > Look back over the past few weeks since I have joined. > > > > Have I slandered anyone ? Or have I held anyone up > > for ridicule ? > > > > i think there was a parable about someone casting the > > first stone...... > > > Blimey! He's back! Pick 12 from the LUG and we'll all get in behind you. > Ps we have several Marks and a few Johns if you want continuity. Just a thought. With all the pseudonyms and multiple subscribing on this list it is entirely possible that there are in fact less than twelve of us in this forum. However, I have heard it said that the LEG is full of the self righteous and I suspect they will gladly make up any shortfall once they come to terms with the LUG being chosen ahead of them. :-) Graham http://geebeephoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html