Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:56:21 -0500
References: <200203081635.g28GZlp26582@sushi.toad.net>

Blacktape Doctor,
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless



> 
> Utterly unenforceable. I know one case in which a person has participated
> in the LUG under at least 5 names, and I don't think that any of those is
> actually his real name.
>
> Anybody know what "B.D." stands for?

Big Daddy ???

sl
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Steve LeHuray" <icommag@toad.net> (Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)