Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] A Second Body
From: "Langhans, Aram" <araml@naches.wednet.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:36:29 -0800

A second body?  I could sure use one.  My first body is having knee
problems, back problems and eye problems.  Anyone want to donate a second
body to me?  Male, preferably, but my wife says I sometimes should be in her
shoes, so maybe female just to get another perspective on life.  After 52
years I might just need it.

But back to the topic on hand.  R8 and R4, or R8 and Rollei 3.5F.

Aram



> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:14:16 -0800
> From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
> Subject: [Leica] A Second Body
> Message-ID: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNEELBILAA.red735i@earthlink.net>
> References: 
> 
> I was wondering what might be the LUG's (multiple) opinion 
> about choice of a
> second body, if you carry around 2 bodies....  For the sake 
> of clarity,
> please note your primary body as well.  For those with many bodies (
> multiple Leica disorder?), I suggest you state your 
> combinations of bodies
> that you use...
> 
> Examples:
> M2 + IIIC
> M6TTL .85  + M2
> M6 .72 + CL
> M3 + Bessa L
> 
> Or whatever you like...
> 
> My personal choice is 1 body... a M6TTL .72... 2 bodies is 
> too much for my
> tourist style...
> 
> Frank Filippone
> red735i@earthlink.net
> 
> - --
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Andrew Schroter <schroter@optonline.net> (Re: [Leica] A Second Body)