Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Adam, The hatrack comes out quite dark on my monitor, the way you describe your intent. But I find the image somewhat unbalanced, with all the brightness on the right. I like the second alternate much better, there is a lot to look at but it does not seem messy. Nathan Adam Bridge wrote: > My contribution for the week 9 PAW is now up. I think, in general, I'm a bit out > of step with the tastes of the LUG judging from the near-universal silence > regarding the last three posts. Saying you DON'T like something is okay, you > know. > > All comments are welcome. > > I AM vexed, however, in the way the images display -- in general they all come > out much too light. hatrack should have virtually no detail in the black at all > and the rack itself should vanish into darkness at the bottom of the photo. > > When I view the image with my Mac and use Photoshop or Preview (in OS X) the > darkness is retained. When I look with any of three different web browsers it's > like the gamma has been messed with. I am unable to account for why this is > happening and would like suggestions on how I might avoid it. > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/hatrack.jpg> > > There are two alternates: > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/still-life.jpg> > > and > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/skyballs.jpg> > > My PAW page is located at: > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/hatrack.jpg> > > Thank you. > > Adam Bridge > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Nathan Wajsman Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html