Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan: I learned that what is sometimes the best exposure for projecting is often too dense for scanning. If I am doing a scenic, sometimes the bracket one half stop lighter scans better. Regards, Robert At 05:49 PM 3/5/2002 +0100, Nathan Wajsman wrote: >"Robert G. Stevens" wrote: > > > At 10:59 PM 3/4/2002 +0100, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > > >Doug, > > > > > >Thanks for your comments, and I think you are right. I did increase the > > >brightness on the picture of my daughter in Photoshop > > > > Nathan: > > > > You are supposed to put more brightness in the picture at the time of > > exposure ;-) Dark slides, are impossible to scan and correct. > >But Robert, the slide looks just fine on the light table! This is just an >example of the fact that even a fairly decent scanner like my Nikon LS-2000 >cannot cope well with slides that have a very wide range. You'll have to take >my word for it, the slide looks beautiful when projected or laid on the light >table. > >Nathan >-- >Nathan Wajsman >Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland > >e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch > >Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm >General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html