Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] noctilux versions
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 14:25:15 -0800
References: <F285IEEi8TywMfgZUr30001310d@hotmail.com>

Speaking of higher production tolerances, would it be smarter to send
newer
lenses to Leica for service, since they have the proper gear to center
and align
everything? Some of the tolerances that Puts describes in his books are
pretty
darn tight and I wonder if they can be achieved with out the specialized
(read very expensive) gear that Leica has in their factories. I have had
older lenses succesfully
serviced by small shops, but I wonder if they are able to work at the
level
of precison that the new lenses requieres. 


feli



Victor Wek wrote:
> 
> According to Erwin there is difference between new production and old. Due
> to smaller tolerances in new production process and different lens coating,
> the new one is better.  Although  I usually follow his recommendations, in
> terms of Noctilux I decided, I will try new one vs old (first series). New
> Noctilux give me a little to ?harsh? images in the range of  apertures 5.6
> to 11 (who uses the lens in that aperture anyway?). Then I decided on old
> version. This is personal opinion, and I know other people like new
> production look. But, everyone hates lens shade on new one.
> 
> Victor
> 

- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

When your head is full of dust and tofu it's easy to smile all the time.
							-Ethan Ormsby
________________________________________________________________________
      		 Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor 
        feli@d2.com * DIGITAL DOMAIN * (310) 314-2800 ext.3074
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Victor Wek" <photvictor@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] noctilux versions)