Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What's the real question, Victor? And what are you going to use the lens for? As you say, they are both great lenses. So will you get more use out of a 60mm lens, or a 100mm lens. Both are 2.8s, both are excellent macros. B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Victor Wek Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:44 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro Is it a visible difference in photos taken by 60/2.8 or 100/2.8 macro R lenses? According to many reviews both are great performers. 100/2.8 macro is a newer design. Does anyone has or had both and can tell me a photo differences, if any? I know, there is a difference in price, weight, distance from subject to lens in max magnification… Thank you, Victor _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html