Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 16:07:17 -0500

What's the real question, Victor? And what are you going to use the lens
for? As you say, they are both great lenses. So will you get more use out of
a 60mm lens, or a 100mm lens. Both are 2.8s, both are excellent macros.

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Victor Wek
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 8:44 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro


Is it a visible difference in photos taken by 60/2.8 or 100/2.8 macro R
lenses?
According to many reviews both are great performers. 100/2.8 macro is a
newer design. Does anyone has or had both and can tell me a photo
differences, if any?
I know, there is a difference in price, weight, distance from subject to
lens in max magnification…

Thank you,
Victor


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html