Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leicagate
From: Pablo Kolodny <pablokolodny@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:27:19 -0800

Ernie, 

It sounds good you feel thanked to Erwin's stories, statements, answers and
so on but is really important to get M7 info earlier, first than any other
in the world ? or what it really is important is to have M7 info... things
coming up earlier don't seem to be better, nor to serve better.
I, eve, would not buy a M7 first batch. I would play with it, indeed but
will keep off getting one until it's quiet tested by users and then
"re-made" by our Solms guys.

regards

Pablo

> 
> Erwin - a personal thank you for your work and this goes for your recent
> email to the group - I very much appreciated hearing about YOU and your
> Leica and non-Leica activities.  You've answered the questions posed by
> others and I would think this should be the last on this issue.  I also want
> to mention that Erwin brought us as best I can tell the info about the M7
> fastest and most reliable.  I was up early on Sunday and there was nothing
> on the M7 until Erwin's report was transported here by another individual.
> There are still on Tuesday many people on the Usegroup still asking - "is it
> true, is the M7 a reality?".
> 
> Once Again thank you Erwin
> 
> ernie nitka
> 
> http:/home.twcny.rr.com/nitka
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] Leicagate)