Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you do not think the newer one will improve your photos, then sell it. Why carry around extra weight and $$$ if it does not pay off in the images? That said, it probably will improve some images, like maybe flare-prone situations? I'm guessing, I have never used one. Me, I use older 35 'lux and older 50 'cron - no desire to update them, they are perfect for me. It kills me how small the oler 35 'lux is - just incredible, and it can perform too! - - marc Henry Ting wrote: >I just got the new 35 ASPH, now together with the pre >ASPH version, I have 2 35 crons, and I have a hard >time deciding which to keep. >The pre-version is smaller and lighter (150 gm) and >the ASPH version is bigger and weighs (250 gm). To me, >the ASPH version is slighter better in pictorial >quality, but not by much when I examine prints in >8x10. The newest and the greatest is tempting, but my >pre-asph version is no slough and being the smallest, >lightest lens, its a perfect match to the Leica M. >What do you guys think ? I only want to keep one. > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games >http://sports.yahoo.com >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- *** Marc Attinasi *** * mailto: marc@attinasi.org * * http://www.attinasi.org * - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html