Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Which 35 cron should I keep.
From: Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 01:35:00 -0500
References: <20020216055446.42231.qmail@web14004.mail.yahoo.com>

One would think that if you just spent money to buy the ASPH, you would
unload the older lens.

Henry Ting wrote:
> 
> I just got the new 35 ASPH, now together with the pre
> ASPH version, I have 2 35 crons, and I have a hard
> time deciding which to keep.
> The pre-version is smaller and lighter (150 gm) and
> the ASPH version is bigger and weighs (250 gm). To me,
> the ASPH version is slighter better in pictorial
> quality, but not by much when I examine prints in
> 8x10. The newest and the greatest is tempting, but my
> pre-asph version is no slough and being the smallest,
> lightest lens, its a perfect match to the Leica M.
> What do you guys think ? I only want to keep one.
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Henry Ting <henryting10@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Which 35 cron should I keep.)