Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Salgado Revisted
From: "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 17:12:44 -0600
References: <200202122115.QAA09600@marconi.concentric.net> <000f01c1b416$8ce850c0$633f4d18@gv.shawcable.net>

> George Lottermoser wrote:
> >>I recommend, when viewing a work of art, try to let your
> > "knowledge" of the creator, and even history, go and allow the
> > image (film, whatever) to speak for itself. If you never heard of
> > Salgado, what do you see and feel from the image?<<<<
Well, in an individual work, that can be possible. But even then, if it's
one of Riefenstahl's photos of Nazi Germany...

> Who the hell cares what the supposed message is, under lying usually if
> there is one, unless the viewer is one of those overly active intellects
> always trying to figure out the meaning of the universe and why snow
flakes
> are not the same.
*cough*

I wouldn't call it "overly active" so much as "bored a lot."

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Salgado Revisted)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Salgado Revisted)