Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Schneider has changed their site and this link no longer works. The page: http://www.schneideroptics.com/info/white_papers/optics_for_digital_photogra phy.pdf contains a white paper on Optics for Digital Photography. I don't know if it's the same paper. Andy - ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Prakel" <dgp@btconnect.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 2:26 AM Subject: [Leica] Digital and lens resolution was Re: APD out > >> Digital in the R line would be a good excuse to sell more lenses. > > > > Yes, if using the same lens mount. > > The LUG has carried a lot of messages about wished-for digital cameras for > the R and M systems. And how Leica lenses would be great with digital. As > they stand Leica lenses are simply too high resolution to be suitable for > digital imaging. > > If you look at any of the 'converted' 35mm SLRs that are used as platforms > for digital cameras - I'm thinking principally of the Kodak 520/560 and 760 > Canon/Nikon rebuilds - you will see that they have a so-called > 'anti-aliasing' filter in the throat of the the lens mount. This acts as a > replaceable dust filter, as a 'hot mirror' filter to cut down IR and UV but > most importantly as a blurring filter to limit the lens resolution to about > 40lpm max. > > On the other-hand colour fringing performance is more important with digital > than with conventional film - Leica is OK on that score! > > Don't take my word for it - Schneider has published an excellent white paper > on why high resolution lenses are unsuited to digital applications. > > www.schneideroptics.com/white/kina.htm > > -- > David G Prakel > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html