Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Focomat IIc
From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:06:13 -0800
References: <NFBBLIJBDGOPKNEEJPAPGEDEDDAA.szbalu@westel900.net> <00ad01c1aa18$586c15a0$762d0dce@g4s5g1> <008901c1aa7d$3d720100$efc69d42@f6bq001> <3C59E875.3050909@shaw.ca> <009c01c1aac5$7b0fd940$efc69d42@f6bq001>

"Dr. Elliot Puritz" wrote:

> Thanks to Greg and all of my friends on the LUG who responded about the
> Focomat.  However, I wonder if an enlarger that can do 120 and 4x5 might be
> more generally useful.  I am thinking of one of the Saunders line, but the
> cost, of course, is incrementally very high. I have followed the discussion
> as to developing and printing carefully.  Presently I am leaning towards a
> Jobo for film, and trays for prints.  I am curious, however, as to an
> opinion from those of you who have used the Jobo for prints as well and
> would ask for comments as you feel indicated.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>

The Focomat IIc does both 35 and 120. 6x7 at least in 120, maybe 6x9. I don't
recall.

But it does not do 4x5.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Szabó Balázs <szbalu@westel900.net> ([Leica] Focomat IIc)
Message from "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com> ([Leica] Re: Focomat IIc)
Message from "Dr. Elliot Puritz" <drpuritz@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Focomat IIc)
Message from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Focomat IIc)
Message from "Dr. Elliot Puritz" <drpuritz@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Focomat IIc)