Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was indeed. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Paul Chefurka Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:29 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Two "new" images On Sun, 27 Jan 2002 12:29:07 -0500, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote: >I offer up photos 3 & 4 at the URL below - one shot two weeks ago, one shot >in June, 1968 - and which is the Leica shot? ;-) > > > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SeePhoto/files/B.%20D.%27s%20Photos/ There's no objective way to tell which is the Leica shot. I'd like to think 4 is the one, but that's just because I have a prejudice linking Leicas to social justice documentary photos. I prefer 4 to 3, both because of the message (I like nice obvious stuff, and the enigma in 3 makes me think too hard), and because of the tonality of the image. 1968 was one hell of a year. Paul - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html