Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I prefer a convention that allows filtering. Right now I have all email with PAW in the subject going to a seperate PAW folder, and it is mostly working. If we had a convention to post PAW notices and critiques with a subject like: [PAW] Marc Attinasi's week 12 posted or for replies: Re: [PAW] Attinasi's week 12 - is that a Leica or a Holga? and Re: [PAW] Attinasi's week 12 - my too sents... then we could filter pretty reliably. (I do not participate in the PAW thang, and the year has not progressed that far yet, it was just an example.) The additional list would be OK, but seems like overkill to me. - - marc Brian Reid wrote: > The Picture A Week movement, bravely started by Kyle Cassidy last > year, is an amazing success. I am absolutely thrilled that so many > people are actually taking pictures with their Leicas. > > It does, though, present for the LUG what we in the computer industry > call a "success crisis". The traffic on the LUG has increased > dramatically since so many people jumped in to PAW. I can't possibly > object; this is what it's all about, but I do have to find a way to > focus the PAW traffic somehow. > > I have a few ideas. Like so many other ideas, they involve programming > computers to do things somewhat differently. In the meantime, how > would people feel about a sub-list whose entire purpose was PAW > critiques. I'm not proposing this as a long-term solution, but it > might ameliorate things in the short term. > > Brian Reid > LUG Barkeeper > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html