Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Weeks #2 & #3 "logo"
From: Alastair Firkin <>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:09:14 +1100
References: <> <p05100304b86e4c007281@[]> <05bd01c1a088$812708e0$59005043@andrewsc>

>My guess is that Neal used the logo "as is" from Leica while yours was not
>"as is" from Leica as you used "LUG" instead of "Leica".

Neal has the "standard" logo as well as an "adapted" LUG logo. Though 
a little different, they objected to the use of the "adapted" LUG 
logo when I enquired.

As I've said, its no big deal, and in reality, perhaps I was "stupid" 
to ask ;-)

- -- 
Alastair Firkin

The Family of Man 2 Exhibit for Year one is now showing:
- --
To unsubscribe, see

Replies: Reply from "Mike Durling" <> (Re: [Leica] Re: Weeks #2 & #3 "logo")
In reply to: Message from "Neal Friedenthal" <> ([Leica] Re: Weeks #2 & #3 "logo")
Message from Alastair Firkin <> ([Leica] Re: Weeks #2 & #3 "logo")
Message from Andrew Schroter <> (Re: [Leica] Re: Weeks #2 & #3 "logo")