Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M Topplate M2-3-4-5 vs. M6-M7
From: "Don" <don.ro@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:53:41 -0600
References: <pe2e4uo7vjbt2a0p1392tmk01q2mqukma8@4ax.com>

Kinda like it was finished in an 8th grade shop class rather than by
German craftsmen and women?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <bachchaconne@my-deja.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M Topplate M2-3-4-5 vs. M6-M7


> The traditional Leica script logo is owned by
> http://www.leica-microsystems.com/
> and Leica Camera AG pays a licensing fee for its usage.
>
> Andrew
>
> >I had my  chrome M4 out with my chrome M6 classic. The M4 topplate is
a
> >thing of beauty while the M6 topplate looks barren. Why can't Leica
put
> >out a model of the 6  and the 7 with an engraved topplate and charge
an
> >extra $50. I would be glad to pay the extra. I am sure it would
increase
> >sales. I have heard they sold the rights to the engraved topplate and
> >had to buy it back for the LHSA model.
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see
http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from bachchaconne@my-deja.com (Re: [Leica] M Topplate M2-3-4-5 vs. M6-M7)