Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello all: I read marc's Leitz/Leica postwar history with interest. I've been buying and using Leicas since the late 1940s and from the early 1960s have been familiar and friendly with the folks at E. Leitz NY from the time when they were at Park Avenue South and Hudson Street in Manhattan. I also frequented photo shops large and small throughout New York City. What particularly caught my attention was his assertion that Leitz recommended annual CLAs of their new cameras. Never heard of such a thing. I also know that the smaller camera stores - which significantly outnumbered the big ones, never had a repair man in-house. So I shared marc's post with several photograper friends all of whom have used Leicas for many years. None had ever heard of a suggestion by Leitz/Leica of a yearly CLA. One of them has just written me as follows: **Most Leica dealers in the United States in the 50's and 60's did not have an on-board repair guy. Some of the larger stores may have but Leica franchises included many little stores that could not afford a separate tech under salary. Besides, Leitz New York had the large repair facility at Hudson Street in New York City that could handle anything from a CLA to installing flash synch in a IIIc. And Leitz NY needed to keep their repair facility fully functioning and with a regular flow of maintenance and repair business. They were really good, their service was flawless and turnaround times quick. They didn't need the small shops. **And an annual CLA??? I've been in Leicas for over 40 years and never heard this before. Leitz NEVER recommended annual CLA's. I think marc sometimes makes a lot of this up to sound profound and wise. What is his authority or evidence for such a nonsense claim? And if the build quality of the new M6's is so good, why do used M2/3/4 cameras fetch higher prices than new M6s not only for collector cameras but even for users in nice condition? **The M3 is a demonstrated 50 year success story (a late LN M3 in box recently sold on eBay for $3,200.). During its short 17 years, the M6 has been and sometimes still is questioned as to its quality. Marc is right about one thing, today's Leica workforce is not, all in all, as capable as the Leitz workforce during the 1950s and 60s nor does it have that group's pride of workmanship to the same degree.** Let the drums begin. Seth LaK 9 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html