Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M Topplate M2-3-4-5 vs. M6-M7
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:27:57 -0600
References: <3C4590D3.90401@istate.net>

Replying to my own post to see if it gets sent correctly.
.
Bill Satterfield wrote:

>
> I had my  chrome M4 out with my chrome M6 classic. The M4 topplate is 
> a thing of beauty while the M6 topplate looks barren. Why can't Leica  
> put out a model of the 6  and the 7 with an engraved topplate and 
> charge an extra $50. I would be glad to pay the extra. I am sure it 
> would increase sales. I have heard they sold the rights to the 
> engraved topplate and had to buy it back for the LHSA model.
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> ([Leica] M Topplate M2-3-4-5 vs. M6-M7)