Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: M6TTL vs "Classic" question
From: BOB KRAMER <BobKramer@COOPERCARRY.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:48:28 -0500

Your arguement doesn't make a lot of sense, B.D.  There is no reason in the
world to expect an M2/3/4 to crap out on you during a shoot just because of
its age, as long as it is properly maintained.

Now, if one felt they had to have TTL light metering to, as you say, deliver
the bacon, that is a personal choice, and another story altogether.

BK

- -----Original Message-----
From: B. D. Colen [mailto:bdcolen@earthlink.net]
Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: M6TTL vs "Classic" question

M3s and M2s are all OLD cameras. They may indeed represent the pinnacle of
Leica mechanics and design. They may indeed feel wonderful. They certainly
have less flare-prone viewfinders, and more metal parts. BUT...They are old.
And while they are great for shooting the grandkids, or taking on that trip
to Venice, if you need to depend upon your cameras to deliver the proverbial
bacon, then it makes little sense not to use a 1-10-year-old camera, rather
than a 40 to almost 50 year old camera. Things get old, they wear out and
die. Just like people.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html