Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]on 1/11/02 8:01 AM, Steven Alexander at alexpix@worldnet.att.net wrote: http://slideone.com/PAWimages/week02.02.html http://slideone.com/PAWimages/week02alt.02.html > The second is more compelling. I would crop the lower right; but I would > also crop the left to the edge of the building. Yes I agree the utility > poles are interesting but they demand attention and compete with the design > element central to the photo, the building and its interest. The poles were the reason I shot it off angle. The question is would there be enough interest left in just the building...? I'm not sure if there is. Plus the real poles seem to help out the shadows of the other poles on the building itself... If I didnšt include the poles I would have shot it straight on just looking up to keep more of the far wall in the shot. Shooting more variations would have given me that to look at. Thanks - -- John Chicago, IL http://SlideOne.com ==================== - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html