Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?
From: Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 19:27:12 -0800 (PST)

Thanks for your responses to this question; you've satisfied my
curiosity! The consensus seems to be that the 50 Summilux-M is a very
respectable lens but that it doesn't attract much comment these days
because it's been around, relatively unchanged, for so many years. 

From an aesthetic point of view, I must say that my Wetzlar 50mm
Sumilux-M is a handsome looking beast. The current M lenses that I've
seen don't seem to have the same charm about them somehow. YMMV of
course :-) 

Regards,

=====
Ray

"The trouble with resisting temptation is
 you never know when you'll get another chance!"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?)