Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rolfe: I would be interested in this comparison as well. Given what I stated in an earlier post that Xtol in Canada at least cost about twenty to thirty cents a roll, it would be interesting to see if the 1:2 and 1:3 dilutions really make any difference. BTW, have you done TMAX 400 in your ATL-1000 yet? What are your times? I have an ATL-1000 and will be developing some TMAX 400 this evening in XTOL 1:1. Regards, Robert Regards, Robert At 03:05 PM 1/5/2002 -0500, Rolfe Tessem wrote: >would love to see someone post comparative results from the same material >shot on the same film at the same time (with a Leica, of course, just to >keep this vaguely on topic) processed 1:1 and 1:3. Again, according to >Kodak, going to 1:1 from straight stock results in enhanced sharpness, >slightly increased film speed, and slightly increased grain. My own >results suggest that this is true. > >My question would be, which of these three results changes for you when >going from 1:1 to 1:3 dilution and to what degree? > > >-- > >Rolfe Tessem >rolfe@ldp.com >New York City - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html