Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I had a similar problem, not too long ago, when I was working on a story on cock fighting. I asked the Sheriff's Dept. about the legality of my being at a fight undercover. Since I was with a known media outlet, accredited by the Sheriff's Dept., it wasn't seen as a problem. But they would of like to know before hand where we were, so they could do their job. At that time Arizona was a haven for cock breeders, whereas it was completely illegal in California. So we weighted the possibility of a road trip to get out of state to do the portion that would of been a problem here in California. Needless to say, the story wasn't budgeted for the extra expense, and that's where it ended. Slobodan Dimitrov Austin Franklin wrote: > > > The question is whether, when hired by an organization > > I don't believe who hired him is of any consequence to his legal > responsibility... > > > to shoot their apparently illegal action, the PHOTOGRAPHER is a > > part of the > > illegal action, or can in some convoluted way claim the > > protection of being > > a JOURNALIST. > > It depends on what the "illegal action" is. If he was trespassing, then he > was trespassing. If he was shooting pictures of, say, a bank robbery...then > he'd hardly be considered party to the illegal action(s)...unless he knew > about the proposed activity beforehand, and that it was illegal, I guess he > could be considered an accomplice. > > I don't believe there is any protection for a photojournalist if s/he is > actually DOING something illegal, they should be subject to the same laws as > everyone else is...but just taking pictures of an illegal activity doesn't > make you party to the activity in and of it self I don't believe. > > What about newspaper reporters who have information (like specifics about a > hit or a robbery), aren't they protected from revealing their sources, and > the details of the information, per se? I guess one could make a convoluted > argument for protection? > > Austin > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html