Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] On agitation
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 07:42:28 +0100
References: <B853EAB3.2B76%abridge@mac.com>

Adam,

I use a Jobo processor, so agitation is continuous in my case. Per the
recommendations of Anchell & Troop and several LUGgers, I use XTOL at 1+3 and
experiment with the times. In general, I find that I need shorter times than
those given in Kodak's data sheet, which is not surprising.

Nathan

Adam Bridge wrote:

> Okay - a wet work question.
>
> I've been reading the Darkroom Cookbook and then the data sheet for XTOL
> from Kodak. There's a pretty big difference between these two. Is there a
> general consensus about XTOL and agitation? I've been following the Kodak
> instructions but am going to try the Cookbook suggestions as I move to metal
> tanks.
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam Bridge
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> ([Leica] On agitation)